Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:41

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
AMC Theaters to Run Even More Commercials Before Movies Play - Bloomberg.com
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Will asteroid 2024 YR4 hit the moon? - Phys.org
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Boston Red Sox rookie ‘revelation’ made ‘huge’ throw before walkoff - MassLive
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
World Boxing apologizes for naming Olympic champion Imane Khelif in sex test policy - NBC News
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
White Sox Place Luis Robert Jr. On 10-Day Injured List - MLB Trade Rumors
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.